Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/ULIS_123456789/2173
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorNguyễn, Thanh Hà-
dc.contributor.authorTrần, Trà My-
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-25T04:16:55Z-
dc.date.available2019-07-25T04:16:55Z-
dc.date.issued2019-07-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/ULIS_123456789/2173-
dc.descriptionABSTRACT Common opinions often link leadership to stereotypically extroverted characteristics such as charisma, optimism, sociableness, authority, and energy. However, it is not always easy to identify introvert and extrovert personality, and some research has suggested that introverted personality is not incompatible with effective leadership. This study involved three self-identified introverts who had held various leadership positions as students. The participants completed the 16 Personalities Test to triangulate their self-perception and joined semi-structured interviews to reflect on and share their leadership and communication experiences. their narratives demonstrate that their self-perception as introverts is closely linked to their preferred environment, emotional responses and communicational comfort zone. While varied in their level of self-acceptance, they tend to object to stereotypes of introverts as lacking in communication skills and see introversion-extroversion as a spectrum. Regarding communication styles, their responses were analyzed based on the adapted framework by de Vries et al. (2009), including preciseness, expressiveness, emotionality, supportiveness, threatening, and reflectiveness and revealed both similarities and diversities in their priorities and communication strategies.vi
dc.description.abstractABSTRACT Common opinions often link leadership to stereotypically extroverted characteristics such as charisma, optimism, sociableness, authority, and energy. However, it is not always easy to identify introvert and extrovert personality, and some research has suggested that introverted personality is not incompatible with effective leadership. This study involved three self-identified introverts who had held various leadership positions as students. The participants completed the 16 Personalities Test to triangulate their self-perception and joined semi-structured interviews to reflect on and share their leadership and communication experiences. their narratives demonstrate that their self-perception as introverts is closely linked to their preferred environment, emotional responses and communicational comfort zone. While varied in their level of self-acceptance, they tend to object to stereotypes of introverts as lacking in communication skills and see introversion-extroversion as a spectrum. Regarding communication styles, their responses were analyzed based on the adapted framework by de Vries et al. (2009), including preciseness, expressiveness, emotionality, supportiveness, threatening, and reflectiveness and revealed both similarities and diversities in their priorities and communication strategies.vi
dc.description.tableofcontentsTABLE OF CONTENTS Acceptance Acknowledgements Abstract Table of contents Chapter 1: Introduction 1.1. Background of the study 1.2. Statement of research problem and questions a) Statement of the problem and rationale for the study b) Aims and objectives 1.3. Scope of the research 1.4. Significance of the study Chapter 2: Literature review 2.1. Leadership a) Definitions b) Types of leadership c) Leadership skills 2.2. Introvert and extrovert Chapter 3: Methodology 3.1. Selection of participants 3.2. Data collection a) Questionnaire b) Interviews 3.3. Data analysis Chapter 4: Findings and discussion 4.1. Overview of participants a) Participant number 1: Linh b) Participant number 2: Heli c) Participant number 3: Zu 4.2. Introverted student leaders’ perceptions of introversion and extroversion a) Interests / preferences b) Emotional responses c) Communication skills and comfort zone d) Introversion and extroversion as a spectrum e) Self-acceptance 4.3. Introverted student leaders’ communication styles a) Preciseness b) Expressiveness c) Emotionality d) Supportiveness e) Threateningness f) Reflectiveness Chapter 5: Conclusion 5.1. Summary of major findings 5.2. Implications 5.3. Limitations and suggestions for further research References Appendices i ii iii iv 1 1 2 2 4 4 5 6 6 6 6 8 9 11 11 12 12 13 13 15 15 15 16 16 18 18 20 21 23 23 25 26 29 31 32 35 37 39 39 40 40 42 46vi
dc.language.isoenvi
dc.publisherĐại học Ngoại ngữ - Đại học Quốc gia Hà Nộivi
dc.subjectphong cáchvi
dc.subjectlãnh đạovi
dc.subjecttự nhậnvi
dc.titleCommunication styles of self-identified introverted student leaders in Hanoi- A multiple case studyvi
dc.title.alternativePhong cách giao tiếp của lãnh đạo học sinh tự nhận là hướng nội ở Hà Nội : Nghiên cứu trên nhiều đối tượngvi
dc.typeDatasetvi
Appears in Collections:Khóa luận tốt nghiệp

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
E.KL.GTVH.224.pdf93.68 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.