Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/ULIS_123456789/2177
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorPhạm Thị, Hạnh-
dc.contributor.authorTrịnh, Ngọc Huyền-
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-13T09:00:04Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-13T09:00:04Z-
dc.date.issued2019-07-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/ULIS_123456789/2177-
dc.descriptionABSTRACT Recent years have witnessed the rise in the number of English learners with the sole aim of communicative English, which led to the bloom of English communicative programs and communicative English centers in Hanoi. Since there are many centers, the quality of teachers in the centers is questioned. In particular, incidents about teachers’ manners and attitude in the classroom has been a widely discussed topic, ever since the news about a teacher calling her students names. To give an insight in to teachers’ language in the classroom, specifically politeness, this research particularly focuses on the use of politeness strategies by teachers in a communicative English center. This aims to look at whether the teachers are aware of pragmatics knowledge of politeness, and the actual use of politeness strategies they used in the classroom, which shows the quality of English education in the center. The study used a mix of qualitative and quantitative approach, in which semi-constructed interviews and frequency count methods were used. Five teachers from an English communicative center were interviewed about their perceptions and understanding of pragmatic politeness. Then, an analysis of their real instructions was conducted under the framework of politeness request strategies proposed by Blum-Kulka (1987). The findings showed that most teachers placed a high importance on the use of politeness strategies, yet in reality, according to the frequecy count, they could not manifest the politeness in their own instructions in the classroom. One teacher did not consider being totally polite as important. Most teachers used imperatives and hints, which are on the less polite spectrum. This exploratory study adds to the literature on teachers’ manners. It is vital that while teaching a language, teachers give a model of how the language is actually used, hence would affect students’ input and output later on. Other teachers who might come across this study would see a framework for critical reflection of their own language use in the classroomvi
dc.description.abstractABSTRACT Recent years have witnessed the rise in the number of English learners with the sole aim of communicative English, which led to the bloom of English communicative programs and communicative English centers in Hanoi. Since there are many centers, the quality of teachers in the centers is questioned. In particular, incidents about teachers’ manners and attitude in the classroom has been a widely discussed topic, ever since the news about a teacher calling her students names. To give an insight in to teachers’ language in the classroom, specifically politeness, this research particularly focuses on the use of politeness strategies by teachers in a communicative English center. This aims to look at whether the teachers are aware of pragmatics knowledge of politeness, and the actual use of politeness strategies they used in the classroom, which shows the quality of English education in the center. The study used a mix of qualitative and quantitative approach, in which semi-constructed interviews and frequency count methods were used. Five teachers from an English communicative center were interviewed about their perceptions and understanding of pragmatic politeness. Then, an analysis of their real instructions was conducted under the framework of politeness request strategies proposed by Blum-Kulka (1987). The findings showed that most teachers placed a high importance on the use of politeness strategies, yet in reality, according to the frequecy count, they could not manifest the politeness in their own instructions in the classroom. One teacher did not consider being totally polite as important. Most teachers used imperatives and hints, which are on the less polite spectrum. This exploratory study adds to the literature on teachers’ manners. It is vital that while teaching a language, teachers give a model of how the language is actually used, hence would affect students’ input and output later on. Other teachers who might come across this study would see a framework for critical reflection of their own language use in the classroomvi
dc.description.tableofcontentsTABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1: INTRODUCTION 1.1. Back ground of the study 1 1.2. Statement of research problem 2 1.3. Scope of the study 3 1.4. Significance of the study 3 1.5. Organization 4 Chapter 2: LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1. Definition of linguistic politeness 5 2.2. Politeness and directness 7 2.3. Politeness strategies by Blum-Kulka (1987) 11 2.4. Politeness strategies in ESL/EFL classrooms 13 2.5. Summary and research gap 15 Chapter 3: METHODOLOGY 3.1. Methodology approach 16 3.2. Setting, population and participants 19 3.3. Data collection and management 22 3.3.1. Data collection instruments 22 3.3.2. Data collection procedure 23 3.3.3. Data management 24 3.4. Data analysis 25 3.5. Summary 27 Chapter 4: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 4.1. Perceptions of English teachers about politeness when giving instructions 28 4.2. Politeness strategies used by English teachers when giving instructions in reality 32 4.3. Discussion of results 35 Chapter 5: CONCLUSION 5.1. Findings 39 5.2. Implications 40 5.3. Limitations and suggestions for further research 40 REFERENCES 41 APPENDICESvi
dc.language.isoenvi
dc.publisherĐại Học Ngoại Ngữ - Đại Học Quốc Gia HNvi
dc.subjectPolitenessvi
dc.subjectcommunicativevi
dc.titlePoliteness strategies used by communicative english teachersvi
dc.typeDatasetvi
Appears in Collections:Khóa luận tốt nghiệp

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
E.KL.NNH.379-đã chuyển đổi.pdf86.59 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.