Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/ULIS_123456789/46
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorHoàng Thị, Hạnh-
dc.contributor.authorTrần Thị Tuyết, Trinh-
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-25T08:25:30Z-
dc.date.available2016-05-25T08:25:30Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.otherLVAGT203-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/ULIS_123456789/46-
dc.description.abstractRegional biases, a quite controversial topic in Vietnam, have been shown to have a bad effect on an individual’s life. Despite this fact, barely has the issue been researched so far. Therefore, the current study was hoped to give a small contribution to the investigation of the problem by depicting an overall picture of regional biases in the area of Internet discussions. Specifically, answers to the four questions related to Internet user’ reactions towards other’s opinions, possible reasons for the formation of regional biases, their consequences and solutions to the issue were investigated. The last two aspects were analyzed based on the perspectives of the Internet users, not of the researcher. To get the results, nine online discussions were analyzed using the technique of content analysis. The findings show that the participants’ reactions towards different opinions can be extremely negative, neutral or positive. Also, first-hand and second-hand experience, bad service, history, geography, population are proposed to contribute to the formation of regional biases, and the consequences of regional biases are suggested to affect a large number of people by the participants. To solve the problem, mutual respect, multiple perspectives, mass media together with better behaviors and services are the key factors as the participants pointed out. Further research can be conducted to examine regional biases in a single online network or at other areas such as schools or companies.vi
dc.description.tableofcontentsACKNOWLEDGEMENT ABTRACT. TABLE OF CONTENT LIST OF FIGURES LIST OF TABLES CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION 1.1. Statement of the problem and the rationale for the study 1.2. Aims and objectives of the study. 1.3. Significance of the study 1.4. Scope of the study 1.5. Organization of the paper CHAPTER II: LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1. Theoretical background 2.1.1. Definitions of bias, regional bias and other closely related terms 2.1.2. Forms of biases and regional biases 2.2. Previous studies CHAPTER III: METHODOLOGY 3.1. Selection of the participants 3.2. Data collection instruments 3.3. Procedures of data collection 3.4. Procedures of data analysis 3.4.1. Phase 1: Data classification 3.4.2. Phase 2: Data coding and decoding CHAPTER IV: FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION 4.1. Overview of participants’ reaction 4.1.1. Participants suffering from regional biases 4.1.2. Participants with biased comments 4.1.3. Outsiders 4.2. Possible reasons for the formation of regional biases 4.2.1. Second-hand experience 4.2.2. First-hand experience 4.2.3. Bad service 4.2.4. History 4.2.5. Geography 4.2.6. Population 4.3. Possible consequences of regional biases 4.3.1. People suffering from regional biases 4.3.2. The country 4.3.3. People with biased opinion 4.4. Suggested solutions 4.4.1. Better behavior 4.4.2. Better service 4.4.3. Mass media 4.4.4. Mutual respect 4.4.5. Multiple perspectives CHAPTER V: CONCLUSION 5.1. Major findings of the study 5.2. Contributions of the study 5.3. Limitations of the study 5.4. Suggestions for further studies REFERENCESvi
dc.language.isovivi
dc.publisherTRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC NGOẠI NGỮvi
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDHNN;KLTN-
dc.subjectREGIONAL BIASES IN INTERNET DISCUSSIONS IN VIETNAMvi
dc.titleREGIONAL BIASES IN INTERNET DISCUSSIONS IN VIETNAMvi
dc.title.alternativeREGIONAL BIASES IN INTERNET DISCUSSIONS IN VIETNAMvi
dc.typeWorking Papervi
Appears in Collections:Khóa luận tốt nghiệp

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
LVAGT203.pdf92.31 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.